Resistant hypertension is diagnosed in patients whose blood pressure target is unmet despite the use of three or more antihypertensive medications. Systemic sympathetic hyperactivation is associated with the development of resistant hyper- tension. As the kidney is largely pervasive of the sympathetic nervous system renal denervation procedure was developed to control blood pressure by attenuating the renal and systemic sympathetic hyperactivity. Renal denervation is a minimally invasive procedure that uses radiofrequency or ultrasound energy waves to reduce the activity of the renal artery nerves. Previous clinical trials have shown conflicting results regarding the efficacy of the procedure. Symplicity HTN-1 and -2 trials showed effective blood pressure lowering results in the renal denervation group with a good safety profile. However, the Symplicity HTN-3 trial showed no difference in blood pressure lowering effect between the renal denervation and control Sham procedure groups. Notwithstanding, some recent clinical trials with Sham control and meta-analysis showed clinical benefits of renal denervation. Other clinical benefits of renal denervation include glucose control, cardiovascular protective effect, reduction of obstructive sleep apnea, and neuralgia control. A subset of patients with satisfactory blood pressure control response to the procedure may experience improved glucose control due to the overall reduced sympathetic activity and insulin resistance. Sympathetic activity control after renal denervation has cardioprotective effects, especially for those with arrhythmia and left ventricular hypertrophy. Also, renal denervation could be helpful in renal- origin pain control. Renal denervation is an effective, safe, non-invasive procedure with many clinical benefits beyond blood pressure control. Further development in the procedure technique and selection of target patients are needed for wider clinical use of renal denervation in resistant hypertension.

• Hypertension
• Renal denervation
• Cardiovascular disease
• Glucose control

Background: Hyperkalemia is a frequent and potentially lethal complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD). We retrospectively examined the potassium-lowering effect of oral fludrocortisone and its adverse effects in hyperkalemic CKD patients not yet on dialysis. Methods: Thirty-three patients (23 men and 10 women, ages 69±14 years) were included. To control hyperkalemia at the outpatient clinic, twenty-one patients (Group 1) received fludrocortisone (0.05–0.1 mg/day) without changes in angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) and calcium polystyrene sulfonate (CPS), while twelve patients (Group 2) were treated with fludrocortisone in addition to stopping ARBs and/or adding low-dose CPS. Results: Fludrocortisone was administered for a median of 169 days (interquartile range, 47–445). At the first follow-up after fludrocortisone administration, serum potassium dropped from 6.14±0.32 mEq/L to 4.52±1.06 mEq/L (p<0.001) in Group 1 and from 6.37±0.35 mEq/L to 4.08±0.74 mEq/L (p<0.01) in Group 2. Ten patients in Group 1 and five patients in Group 2 measured serum potassium levels at four outpatient visits before and after fludrocortisone administration, respectively. The frequency of serum potassium ≥6.0 mEq/L decreased from 19/40 (48%) to 2/40 (5%) (p<0.001) in Group 1 and from 11/20 (55%) to 0/20 (0%) (p<0.001) in Group 2. Eleven patients experienced sodium retention-related problems after fludrocortisone administration: 7 with worsening leg edema, 2 with pleural effusions, and 2 with pulmonary edema. Conclusion: In pre-dialysis CKD patients, fludrocortisone at low doses effectively reduced serum potassium levels; however, sodium retention was a common adverse effect.

• Calcium polystyrene sulfonate
• Chronic kidney disease
• Fludrocortisone
• Hyperkalemia

Although renal infarction (RI) is not a rare disease, its outcomes have not been well-documented. Furthermore, transient resolution and recurrence of RI have not been captured through imaging. We report a case of idiopathic RI that recurred within a short period following transient resolution, as demonstrated by serial computed tomography (CT). A 53-year-old man diagnosed with RI was transferred to the emergency room. An abdominal CT scan at the local hospital revealed a segmental wedge-shaped perfusion defect in the left kidney and a focal thrombotic filling defect in the anterior segmental branch of the left renal artery. Since his left flank pain improved, another CT scan was performed again 6 hours after the initial CT scan. A repeat CT scan showed that the thrombus in the renal artery remained, but the perfusion defect had spontaneously resolved. We initiated anticoagulant therapy using unfractionated heparin. On the sixth day of hospitalization, the left flank pain recurred, prompting another CT scan. The follow-up CT scan confirmed that RI had recurred in the same area as before. We continued anticoagulant therapy and switched to warfarin. After treatment, his symptoms improved, and he was discharged. RI can recur at any time, even after it has spontaneously resolved, as evidenced by our case. Therefore, it is crucial to closely monitor patients who experience resolution of RI for any recurrence of symptoms, and repeat radiological evaluation should be performed even within a short period.

• Renal infarction
• Transient resolution
• Recurrence
• Computed tomography